UK :
Home | Business | Mid East | IDF| Judaism | Readers Stories | Muslim Zionism | Anti-semitism alerts | Forum |Today’s Weblog

author biography
Jim Lobe is an American journalist and the Washington Bureau Chief of the international news agency Inter Press Service, He has also written for a wide range of print and internet news publications.
Lobe is best known for his stiff criticism of U.S. foreign policy, American militarism and particularly the neo-conservatives, their worldview, their relationship to other political tendencies, and their influence in the Bush administration.
He was the first journalist to cover the ties between the post-9/11 agenda pursued by the Bush administration and the recommendations of the neo-conservative-led Project for the New American Century

author website
by this author
by this author:
Likud Wants to Go the Apartheid Route
Video: Origins of the AIPAC, Neocons and Christian Zionist Alliance
From Clarion: A Protocols of the Elders of Islam?
U.S.: Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for `Israel Lobby`
U.S.: Bipartisan Group Urges Deeper Diplomacy with Muslim World
Horowitz Announces `Stop the Jihad on Campus Week`
Palin and `the transcendant issue our time`
The Ledeen Move
Ignatius Concludes Bombing `Not Likely`
Surprise: Sharansky Endorses McCain; Calls Obama `Risk`
Klein-Neo-Con Conflict Gathers Steam
Is Petraeus Preparing to Betray the Neo-Cons?
Hagee on Jews: A New Video
Mullen Gave Israel a Red Light, Says Cordesman
Neo-Con Rage
Ledeen: It’s 1938-1941, Hitler is Hezbollah, al Qaeda, Khomeinists, Wahabis etc.
On Middle East, McCain Vows to Stay the Course
Neo-Cons Silent on Hagee Repudiation by McCain
Media Heavies Question `Pro-Israel` Moniker
National Journal on Adelson and Freedom`s Watch
More on the Likudist Fronts
Is the Pentagon Policy Shop Funding Likudist Fronts?

related articles FEC May Probe Clarion Fund`s Distribution of `Radical Islam` DVD To Swing States
Lieberman: `Time for Israel to Act` Against Iran
Lieberman: Hagee Still Like Moses
Jews and Christians Unite against the Empire of Neo-cons and `Christian` Zionists
Hagee Mass-Marketed Hitler`s Favorite Conspiracy Theory
After McCain Ditches Hagee, He A Gets Warm Reception at AIPAC
Hagee Down But Not Out
Did Taking Cues From Lobby Cost Clinton The Nomination?
Joe Lieberman To Headline Upcoming Hagee Summit
Does Lieberman Still See Hagee As Moses Incarnate?

Neocon Flap Highlights Jewish Divide
Filed under Israeli politics, Christian Zionism, Opinion Editorials, AIPAC, Media objectivity, USA foreign policy, Iraq war, Lobby Groups, Zionism, Neo-Cons, J Street – on Saturday, March 08, 2008 – By: Lobe, Jim

WASHINGTON, Jul 30 (IPS) – A mushrooming media controversy pitting neoconservatives against a prominent Jewish-American political commentator could mark a new stage in the growing battle over who speaks for the U.S. Jewish community on foreign policy issues, particularly regarding the Middle East.
TIME columnist Joe Klein’s accusations that Jewish neoconservatives, who played a particularly visible role in the drive to war in Iraq and have since pushed for military confrontation in Iran, sacrificed “U.S. lives and money…to make the world safe for Israel” have spurred angry charges of anti-Semitism and personal attacks from critics at such neoconservative strongholds as the Weekly Standard, National Review, and Commentary.
But the fierceness of the controversy surrounding Klein, generally considered a political centrist, highlights the growing antagonism between neo-conservative hardliners and prominent U.S. Jews whose more moderate views are aligned more closely with those of the foreign policy establishment.
The controversy began Jun. 24, when Klein argued in a TIME blog post that the “fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives — people like [independent Democrat Sen.] Joe Lieberman and the crowd at Commentary — plumped for this war [in Iraq], and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties.”
Within a day, Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, accused Klein of espousing “age-old anti-Semitic canards about a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate government”.
The reaction from the right-wing press was even harsher. Commentary editor John Podhoretz reiterated the accusation of “anti-Semitic canards” and called Klein “manifestly intellectually unstable”.
Writing in National Review, former George W. Bush speechwriter Peter Wehner called Klein “a man who cannot control his anger and even hatred”.
But Klein has refused to back down, accusing his attackers of using charges of anti-Semitism to silence criticism of neoconservative policies.
“When [Commentary writer] Jennifer Rubin or Abe Foxman calls me anti-Semitic, they’re wrong,” he said in an interview. “I am anti-neoconservative.”
In its broad contours, the controversy is a familiar one, as critics accuse neoconservatives of exercising pernicious influence on U.S. Middle East policy and neoconservatives reply with charges of anti-Semitism and conspiracy-mongering.
What distinguishes the recent furour over Klein, however, is that it involves someone who is widely regarded as an exemplar of the centrist political establishment.
Klein is best known for his 1996 novel “Primary Colors”, a thinly-veiled and largely unflattering portrait of Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign that was originally published anonymously and subsequently made into a Hollywood movie. A frequent critic of Clinton, Klein has at times expressed admiration for George W. Bush.
He also endorsed the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (although he has since expressed regret for his support) and describes himself as “a strong supporter of Israel”.
The Klein dust-up is the latest in a series of events over the last several years that have placed neoconservatives both in the spotlight and on the defensive.
Neo-conservatism, a predominantly — but by no means exclusively — Jewish movement, got its start in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when a small but influential group of Democrats began distancing themselves from the party which, in their view, had become too dovish toward the Soviet Union and too sympathetic toward Arab demands against Israel.
By 1980, most had become strong supporters of Ronald Reagan. A number of prominent neo-conservatives joined his administration, including many who would later play key roles in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.
Consigned to the political wilderness under President George H.W. Bush, the neo-conservatives became increasingly identified in the 1990s with Israel’s right-wing Likud Party. It was also during the same period that they began agitating for “regime change” in Iraq, arguing that such a move would transform the balance of power in the Middle East decisively in favour of both Israel and the U.S.
They experienced a rebirth with the election of Bush’s son in 2000, and particularly after the 9/11 attacks, when they played a major role, both inside the administration and in the media, in rallying the public and Congress behind war in Iraq.
But with the deterioration of the situation in Iraq, the influence of neoconservatives inside and outside the administration began to wane, and critics began charging that they had led the U.S. astray.
A series of incidents also focused critical scrutiny on the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful lobbying group whose hawkish right-wing leadership has often defied both the views of the broader U.S. Jewish community and the policies of Israeli governments.
In 2004, the Justice Department charged Pentagon staffer Lawrence Franklin with passing classified U.S. government documents to two AIPAC lobbyists, who had then given the documents to an Israeli Embassy official. In January 2006, Franklin was sentenced to more than 12 years in prison, while the AIPAC staffers are still awaiting trial.
In March 2006, the well-respected and staunchly realist international relations scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt published the article “The Israel Lobby” in the London Review of Books. That article, which charged that the lobby had for decades skewed U.S. policy towards Israel in a direction detrimental to U.S. interests, became the basis for their 2007 book “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy”.
Mearsheimer and Walt’s thesis was instantly controversial. Like Klein, they were accused by critics, including the ADL and Commentary, of anti-Semitism and of perpetrating stereotypes about shadowy Jewish conspiracies.
But as a result of their stature, the two authors’ work clearly created political space for those, both within the foreign policy establishment and within the U.S. Jewish community, who had been long privately critical of the neo-conservatives but had been worried about the consequences of going public with their misgivings.
More recently, AIPAC has come under fire for its close alliance with right-wing Christian Zionists, particularly controversial pastor John Hagee and his organisation Christians United for Israel (CUFI).
Hagee views an undivided Israel as a precondition for precipitating the Armageddon, and his group has accordingly pushed for hawkish U.S. policies in the Middle East that have been consistent with the neoconservatives’ own preferences.
Matters came to a head earlier this year, when Republican presidential candidate John McCain was compelled to repudiate Hagee’s endorsement after comments came to light in which the pastor suggested that the Holocaust was biblically ordained in order to force Jews to resettle in Israel.
Nonetheless, Hagee and CUFI have maintained close ties with the neo-conservatives, and a collection of prominent Israel hawks, including Senator Lieberman, spoke at CUFI’s summit in Washington earlier this month.
The belief that AIPAC has failed to accurately represent the views of the U.S. Jewish community led to the foundation earlier this year of J Street, a Jewish lobbying group that aims to push for a more moderate stance on Middle East issues.
In the wake of these developments, many observers have taken Klein’s comments — and particularly his refusal to back down in the face of withering criticism from neo-conservatives — as a sign that new political space is being created for the public airing of more moderate views on Middle East policy.
M.J. Rosenberg, a former AIPAC staffer now associated with the moderate Israel Policy Forum, expressed the hope that commentators would stop equating neo-conservatism with Judaism and start treating it as a political movement subject to political criticism.
“Although most neocons are Jews, few Jews are neocons,” he wrote Wednesday. By equating the two groups, “[the neocons] want Americans not to follow the trail of war-mongering that leads not to Jews but to them”.
Daniel Luban and Jim Lobe
The opinions and views articulated by the author do not necessarily reflect those of Israel e News. | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | reddit | Tailrank | Technorati |

Email This Article ... Printer Friendly ... Export to plain text document ... Export to MS Word Document ...

Talkback comments can be read by clicking on the blue headline, and replied to if you are logged in. An icon shows beneath the headline, if the writer has opted to receive emails. Clicking on will enable you to send a private email to the writer.

Please log in to post comments. We encourage Talkback participants to avoid posting comments that violate our code of conduct. Thank you for your co-operation.

Remember Me

First time here? Click here to register  Password reminder


all channels

Israel e News RSS Israel e News feed


Search News For: Search In:               Search Help


..latest forum postings.. On the margin of you…

Author: Sinibaldi
Subject: On the margin of you…
Posted: 08 Feb 09 at 01:00

Here, in
an highest season
full of my care,
I’d like to disco

Author: Lisa11
Subject: hi
Posted: 05 Feb 09 at 10:27

The information you have provided is really useful and great.

The rosette.
Author: Sinibaldi
Subject: The rosette.
Posted: 25 Jan 09 at 01:22

When a candle
appears in the
light of a
fine day, I listen
The voice of a north wind.
Author: Sinibaldi
Subject: The voice of a north wind.
Posted: 11 Jan 09 at 01:19

An alley
brings me in
the sound
of a waterfall,
with a w

Christmas carol.
Author: Sinibaldi
Subject: Christmas carol.
Posted: 02 Jan 09 at 00:04

Shining lights
and the plan
of a destiny,
when Christmas
Christmas carol.
Author: Sinibaldi
Subject: Christmas carol.
Posted: 02 Jan 09 at 00:00

Shining lights
and the plan
of a destiny,
when Christmas
About us | Features | Islamic fundamentalism |Xtian Zionism| USA | Entertainment| Erotica | Authors | Donors | Contact us
copyright ©2006 all rights reserved