UK :
Home | Business | Mid East | IDF| Judaism | Readers Stories | Muslim Zionism | Anti-semitism alerts | Forum |Today’s Weblog

author biography
Jonathan S. Tobin is executive editor of the Jewish Exponent (, Greater Philadelphia’s 120-year-old weekly Jewish newspaper of record as well as Inside magazine, a lifestyles quarterly.
He also serves as a columnist for The Jerusalem Post. On an individual basis, Mr. Tobin has won dozens of awards for commentary, editorial writing, features and arts criticism. He has been named the top columnist for Jewish newspapers as well as the top columnist in Greater Philadelphia several times. In 2006, he was named by the Society of Professional Journalists as the top editorial columnist and top arts critic in Greater Philadelphia, a unique feat in of itself and especially so considering that he was chosen in a competition over writers at large daily newspapers in both categories.
He has also lectured on current affairs to national organizations and to synagogues and on college campuses around the country and appeared on the Fox News Network, CNN and BBC radio and many other media outlets.
Prior to coming to the Exponent in 1998, Mr. Tobin served as executive editor of the Connecticut Jewish Ledger and contributing editor to the Miami Jewish Tribune. A native of New York City, Mr. Tobin attended Columbia College of Columbia University where he studied history.

author website
by this author
by this author:
Making Sense of the `J Street` Jive
A Prayer for Sderot`s Children
Unreasonable Accommodations
Don`t Blame Me, I Just Pray Here!
Your Tax Dollars at Work in Gaza
The Circus Comes to Town
Bill Buckley and the Jews
Obama`s Spurned Supporters
Put It Back on the Table
Were They Really So Wrong?
The Audacity of Criticism
Olmert Can Always Say `No`
Leftist ‘Rape’ Fantasies
Foreign-Policy Presidency Roulette
Iran Plan: Don’t Worry, Be Happy?
Dreaming of a ‘Green’ Chanukah?

related articles Cross-border blog promotes Israel-Gaza peace
U.S. Rice and Bush Support Anti-Christians
Unfair Witness: Alleged Christians of the CPT dehumanize Israelis
Knesset Christian Allies Caucus celebrates anniversary
Israel’s Purging of Palestinian Christians
Christians to sit on Jewish Agency board
Catholic leader rejects Israel’s Jewish identity
This Christmas Happy Hanukkah and a Prosperous Eid
White House told to detail Christian leader visits
Whose Promised Land: Israel and Biblical Prophecy
Archbishop thrown into row over US Middle East policy
Poisonously biased

Other People`s Prayers
Filed under Anti-Semitism, Judaism, Christianity, Jewish history & culture, Opinion Editorials, Religious extremism, Interfaith dialogue – on Thursday, February 14, 2008 – By: Tobin, Jonathon

Interfaith dialogue must be based on the principle that respect is a two-way street
In 1263, the great Spanish scholar Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, better known as Nahmanides, was summoned to Barcelona by King James I of Aragon to engage in a rather stressful form of interfaith dialogue with representatives of the Dominican and Franciscan religious orders.
Their debate is known to history as the Disputation of Barcelona.
The purpose of those who initiated the event (principally, an apostate Jew) was to compel the conversion of Spanish Jewry to Christianity. Guaranteed freedom of speech, Nahmanides, the sole Jewish representative in the proceedings, gave as good as he got in a free-wheeling medieval rhetorical brawl, in which both sides made it clear how little they thought of their opponents’ faith.
Though given a reward by the king for his performance, Nahmanides was eventually forced to flee the country because of the church’s anger. In particular, Pope Clement IV sought to punish the rabbi for his courageous defense of Judaism.
Catholic Revival
Flash forward 745 years and the lessons of the Disputation still stand.  Public arguments about matters of faith can be a dangerous game whose outcome often serves the purposes of those who wish to spread intolerance rather than knowledge.
Though the context of the present day couldn’t be any more different than the circumstances of 1263 Barcelona, many Jews appear to be thinking about interfaith relations with this piece of sad history still in mind.
The latest irritant in Catholic-Jewish relations is the result of the church’s revival of an Easter Week devotion in which believers asked to pray for the conversion of the Jews.
As part of an effort to break down divisions within Catholicism that had grown up around the abandonment of the Latin Mass, last year Pope Benedict XVI allowed the saying of the Tridentine rite. The prayer, which was dropped by the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s, spoke of Jewish “blindness” and asked the Almighty to “remove the veil from their hearts.”
Shocked by this reversion to language that was part of a long history of the teaching of contempt for Judaism, Jewish leaders asked the Vatican to reconsider the move. Last week, the Vatican responded by issuing a new version of the prayer which eliminated the lines about blindness” and the “veil” over Jewish hearts, but did not omit the call for conversion.
The Jewish reaction to this move was anguished. The Anti-Defamation League wrote a letter to the pope asking that he further amend the prayer. The Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist rabbinical movements are all expected to add their pleas soon.
In response, Cardinal Walter Kasper seemed to express bewilderment at the sensitivity of the Jews. He told the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, “I don’t understand why Jews cannot accept that we can make use of our freedom to formulate our papers.” His point was that the prayer “reflects the faith of the church, and furthermore Jews have prayers in their liturgical texts that we Catholics don’t like … one must respect differences.”
While the cardinal’s statement illustrates the slippery slope down which this sort of dispute can soon lead to hurt feelings on all sides, he is, of course, right. Catholics are free to believe whatever they want about the universal truth of the doctrines of their faith. The same right must also apply to everyone else when it comes to their opinions about their own religions and everyone else’s. Problems arise not from believing these different things, but how we act on those differences.
On that score, it is important for Jews to understand that the Catholic Church has, in recent generations, moved light years away from the spirit of the Disputation of Barcelona. Under the inspired leadership of Pope John XXIII and later Pope John Paul II, the Vatican discarded the teaching of contempt for Judaism, and introduced new curricula in their schools and churches based on respect for Judaism and recognition of past persecutions.
As for proselytizing, unlike many Protestant denominations, the church has dropped campaigns to specifically target Jews for conversion.
Yet Jewish groups still fear that if the Vatican, in seeking to mollify its own liturgical conservative wing, moves away from the spirit of Vatican II, it will mean that Catholics no longer embrace John Paul II’s beliefs that taught Catholics to think of Jews as their theological older brothers whose legitimacy should not be questioned.
That fear is genuine and it is based, in no small part, on the legacy of church-based missionizing that was rooted in compulsion and oppression of Jews.
But as Cardinal Kasper told Vatican Radio in another interview, the revised prayer “does not mean we are embarking on a mission” to convert Jews. Rather, they are just expressing their faith.
Jews and Catholics may have many things in common, but they do not accept the fundamentals of each other’s religions. No less than in 1263, Christians believe theirs is the true path to salvation. Jews still disagree. In societies where religion rules all, such as most of the Islamic world, such theological differences are just as much a matter of life and death as they were in Barcelona during the Disputation.
Agreeing to Disagree
But in free societies such as our own, we can merely say, “vive la difference” and leave it at that, knowing none of us will be the worse for wear as a result of our contrasting views about the nature of eternity or divinity.
Genuine interfaith dialogue is not rooted in agreement, but rather, on agreement to disagree. The trick is to do so in a civil manner, and to avoid public attacks on each others faiths that can only lead to discord and prejudice.
So while it is all well and good for Jews to hope that the Catholic Church never chooses to deviate from the path of John Paul II, it is not for Jews to tell Catholics what to say in their prayers, any more than it is legitimate for them to go back to trying to censor the Jewish liturgy as they once did. Respect is a two-way street.
Rather than seek to turn Benedict’s revival of the Tridentine mass into a major issue, what we need to to do is to stop worrying about Catholic prayers, and instead continue the work of bringing the two faiths closer together in defense of Western freedoms.
This a moment in history when the greatest challenge to religious freedom is not coming from the traditional sources of reaction within Christianity, such as those that sought to punish Nahmanides for defending Judaism at Barcelona. Instead, our challenge comes from forces within Islam that have already sought to censor the beliefs of Pope Benedict for defending the West. Their goal is to dismantle the entire edifice of tolerance that Jews and Christians have worked so hard to create.
Given that reality, this is not the time to pick fights over other people’s prayers.
The opinions and views articulated by the author do not necessarily reflect those of Israel e News. | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | reddit | Tailrank | Technorati |

Email This Article ... Printer Friendly ... Export to plain text document ... Export to MS Word Document ...

Thank you,
Jeffrey – Orland-United States – 2/15/2008- 2:04:04 AM GMT

An Answer To The Interfaith Problem,
  wlglick – Alachua-United States – 2/15/2008- 11:45:41 PM GMT

Talkback comments can be read by clicking on the blue headline, and replied to if you are logged in. An icon shows beneath the headline, if the writer has opted to receive emails. Clicking on will enable you to send a private email to the writer.

Please log in to post comments. We encourage Talkback participants to avoid posting comments that violate our code of conduct. Thank you for your co-operation.

Remember Me

First time here? Click here to register  Password reminder


all channels


Search News For: Search In:               Search Help


Click here

Israel e News RSS Israel e News feed

About us | Features | Islamic fundamentalism |Xtian Zionism| USA | Entertainment| Erotica | Authors | Donors | Contact us
copyright ©2006 all rights reserved